Friday, July 27, 2012

Research links sexual imagery and consumer impatience

Research links sexual imagery and consumer impatience [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 26-Jul-2012
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Amy Blumenthal
amyblume@marshall.usc.edu
213-740-5552
USC Marshall School of Business

Finds perception time is a factor

How do sexual cues affect consumer behavior? New research from USC Marshall School of Business Assistant Professor of Marketing Kyu Kim and Gal Zauberman, associate professor of marketing at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, reveals the reasons why sexual cues cause us to be impatient and can affect monetary decisions.

Their paper, "Can Victoria's Secret Change the Future: A Subjective Time Perception Account of Sexual Cue Effects on Impatience," departs from earlier theories indicating that impatience in response to sexual cues is solely an outcome of escalated desire for immediate gratification. Kim and Zauberman hold that the cognitive processes put into play by sexual cues are more complicated; arousal, the researchers contend, actually affects our perception of time.

For example, in one of five studies conducted, male subjects were presented with sexually charged imagery. Afterwards, the subjects were asked to judge whether three and six-month time frames were "very short" or "very long" distances away from the present time. Those who had been exposed to individuals to whom they were attracted, reported the three and six-month time frames to be further into the future than others in the control group, according to the study.

In another study, the researchers presented 116 males with images from an online Victoria's Secret catalog and gauged their response to receiving one of two fictitious Amazon.com promotions: a gift certificate available that day or one available three months from now. They asked the subjects the dollar value that would compensate for having to wait. Those exposed to sexually charged imagery (versus those in a control group exposed to nature images) were found to be more impatient and expressed that future discounts would have to be steeper to compensate for the time delay.

Sex and Promotion:

The research, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, has implications for marketers. For those exposed to sexually charged imagery, future rewards were even less appealing than those with more immediate promotions. Marketers, therefore, who invoke sexual imagery to sell products, must make sure promotions are offered in a more immediate time frame. Consumers with sex on the brain, might be more inclined to spend money more quickly.

###


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Research links sexual imagery and consumer impatience [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 26-Jul-2012
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Amy Blumenthal
amyblume@marshall.usc.edu
213-740-5552
USC Marshall School of Business

Finds perception time is a factor

How do sexual cues affect consumer behavior? New research from USC Marshall School of Business Assistant Professor of Marketing Kyu Kim and Gal Zauberman, associate professor of marketing at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, reveals the reasons why sexual cues cause us to be impatient and can affect monetary decisions.

Their paper, "Can Victoria's Secret Change the Future: A Subjective Time Perception Account of Sexual Cue Effects on Impatience," departs from earlier theories indicating that impatience in response to sexual cues is solely an outcome of escalated desire for immediate gratification. Kim and Zauberman hold that the cognitive processes put into play by sexual cues are more complicated; arousal, the researchers contend, actually affects our perception of time.

For example, in one of five studies conducted, male subjects were presented with sexually charged imagery. Afterwards, the subjects were asked to judge whether three and six-month time frames were "very short" or "very long" distances away from the present time. Those who had been exposed to individuals to whom they were attracted, reported the three and six-month time frames to be further into the future than others in the control group, according to the study.

In another study, the researchers presented 116 males with images from an online Victoria's Secret catalog and gauged their response to receiving one of two fictitious Amazon.com promotions: a gift certificate available that day or one available three months from now. They asked the subjects the dollar value that would compensate for having to wait. Those exposed to sexually charged imagery (versus those in a control group exposed to nature images) were found to be more impatient and expressed that future discounts would have to be steeper to compensate for the time delay.

Sex and Promotion:

The research, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, has implications for marketers. For those exposed to sexually charged imagery, future rewards were even less appealing than those with more immediate promotions. Marketers, therefore, who invoke sexual imagery to sell products, must make sure promotions are offered in a more immediate time frame. Consumers with sex on the brain, might be more inclined to spend money more quickly.

###


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-07/umso-rls072612.php

mega millions results louisville lotto numbers susan powell megamillions winners university of louisville louisville ky

Why should I invest in gold and silver? - Coin Community Forum

Author Previous Topic?Topic?Next Topic ?

greenprint
Valued Member
United States
86 Posts

How can I help support Coin Community?

macmercury
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1595 Posts

greenprint
Valued Member
United States
86 Posts

Posted?07/25/2012? 12:43 am ?Show Profile ? Bookmark this reply Add greenprint to your friends list ?Get a Link to this Reply

like one should spend dollars and not save them but why silver and gold in particular over other material assets?

Well when SHTF does happen and America becomes a third world country for several decades (I don't understand why people just assume we are going to recover in the matter of days, I think it'll be several years) your going to have spend all your gold and silver because all your currency will be worthless. Once your gold and silver dries up and you lost your job that you will probably never reclaim for some time, what are you going to do?

I think perhaps investing in land might be the best idea and start farming. One thing that people will always need, when nobody has jobs, when their currencies are worthless and it costs a thousand dollars to buy a loaf of bread is food. I think one should invest in production assets that allow you to produce things that people will need no matter in what condition the economy is in. If I buy 1000 oz of silver, when shtf i'll still have 1000 oz of silver and no production method to produce more and will eventually have to spend it because i'll have no job to buy food and will most likely not have the ability to buy more silver and gold because i'll have no job and will be to worried about buying other things like food, oil, toilet paper, things that I actually need and will most likely not have money just sitting around to invest in.

yay food

I think investing in production assets is the best way to go so that way I can get a real return on my investment. If I bought a cow and it had a baby I would get a real return (another cow) whose value could go up and down based off of how much our currency is actually worth, but at the end of the day I have another cow no matter what, and a way to produce more if I needed to spend it.

I think simply stockpile up on food is a bad idea as food eventually goes bad, and one should invest in ways to produce food.

id="msg">

Edited by greenprint - 07/25/2012 01:05 am
Send note to staff Go to Top of Page

mkman123
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1268 Posts

traevin
Pillar Of The Community

United States
962 Posts

SDcoinguy
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2040 Posts

Posted?07/25/2012? 08:46 am ?Show Profile ?Check SDcoinguy's eBay Listings ? ?Check SDcoinguy's eCrater Listings Bookmark this reply Add SDcoinguy to your friends list ?Get a Link to this Reply

why gold and silver and not TP?

its just the way they did it from the begging of time... before TP was even invented.

our ancestors went to gold and silver for not just its MONETARY purpose. it was used in building many things back then as well: temples, silverware, cups, vases, armor, jewelry....

at the time there was NOTHING ELSE....

gold and silver have just recently become COMMODITIES, in terms of what they are TODAY. back THEN, 200-2000+ years ago, it was THE standard of wealth and trade.

before that you did use things such as fur skins, weapons, etc.. the indians...

the way things are looking I wouldnt be surprised if the US GOV went to TP as a form of currency...

id="msg">

Send note to staff Go to Top of Page

hockingzig
Pillar Of The Community

USA
1299 Posts

Posted?07/25/2012? 09:21 am ?Show Profile ? Bookmark this reply Add hockingzig to your friends list ?Get a Link to this Reply

If you go back and read many of the archived posts,many of us have said all along that survival hoarding should be first! You need a supply of food(many of the freeze-dried kinds have a 20-25 year shelf-life)no debt,water,firearms and ammo and whatever you need to survive,THEN look at precious metals as a way to preserve your wealth against the currency collapse. PM's are a strategy for having something coming out the other side of a collapse. Some folks are pouring all of their extra cash into PMs without taking care of the"survival" needs. Personally,I have no debt,an 18 month supply of food,4 guns with ammo(I probably need more ammo than I have)for protection and for food acquisition. I even have a hoard of toilet paper. I will keep a small amount of cash on hand for essentials AND 11 ozs. of gold and 160 ozs. of silver. So,I agree with your premise,gold and silver will probably not be all that useful in a currency collapse,but it will make your life a whole lot better when a new economy is established.
id="msg">

"George Washington threw a silver dollar across the Potomac River so history states, but then you have to realize the dollar went a lot further in those days.

Send note to staff Go to Top of Page

greenprint
Valued Member
United States
86 Posts

Islander2010
Valued Member

Canada
100 Posts

allranger
Valued Member

United States
372 Posts

Libertad
Pillar Of The Community

1710 Posts

lostsean
Valued Member

Australia
91 Posts

Namachieli
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1934 Posts

Posted?07/25/2012? 11:33 am ?Show Profile ? Bookmark this reply Add Namachieli to your friends list ?Get a Link to this Reply

The thing most people miss when talking about gold and silver when considering it against inflation/collapse/etc is;

You cannot value it in dollars!

Value it in any other commodity that has value regardless of the "dollar amount" slapped on to it.

Man hours worked
ounces of gold/silver
Gallons of milk
Population

Dollar values only tie together relative worth of two goods/services, so things that are traded in dollars should be compared with their dollar value stripped.

If a gallon of milk costs me $3.50
And an ounce of gold costs me $1,650
The value ratio is 471:1

If milk goes up to $6.50
and gold only increases just a bit to $1,700
the value ratio changes to 261:1

Even though gold went up in "price" it went down in value against Milk.

How about against population? This is one of my favorites.

Currently, there is roughly 7.02B people on the planet. Lets say there is 30,623 tonnes of gold above ground (taken from wikipedia)

In ounces that's around 984,552,305 ozt, or a ratio of 7.13/ozt Au : 1 person

Let say over the next 10 years we add 700M people, and 200M ounces troy of gold.

Now we are at a ratio of 6.5/ozt Au : 1 Person.

The value of gold just went up against the population. Doesn't matter what gold did in dollars.

This is all my opinions/thought's, please don't take it as 100% fact, confirm things for yourself, make your own investments.

For though, I'll be holding for quite some time.

id="msg">
Send note to staff Go to Top of Page

coinwatch
Valued Member

United States
420 Posts

Ed_B
Pillar Of The Community

United States
3221 Posts

? Previous Topic?Topic?Next Topic ?

Source: http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=124978

brian williams patrice o neal patrice o neal wayne gretzky wayne gretzky occupy los angeles occupy los angeles