Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging lead to brain tumors as electromagnetic radiation is now thought to result in cancer?
Posted by MarcThyme
Behold the ignorance of journalism!
I desire, by some means, we failed to have fairly as significantly ?no cost speech? in the media as we do, for it surely does a lot more net harm than web great, especially when some spotty youth with a journalism degree tries to publish a thing ?intelligent? about science even if YOU flunked out of Higher School, you OUGHT to know that ?electromagnetic radiation? is Almost everywhere, and with no it you would certainly die?and the irresponsible celebration responsible for this stupid report ought to know that!
Believe about this logically if I could Demonstrate to you (which I can) that a lot more than a dozen innocent individuals die HORRIBLY each 12 months from a fatal injury caused by a seat-belt, would you assist a ban on the use of seat-belts?
Men and women (typically) do not have MRI?s for ?exciting?, they have them because some thing is awry within them, and an MRI is a reduce-threat method than exploratory surgical procedure?
Posted by palmyrafan
Not if carried out in moderation. I have 2 completed a year to keep a examine on my brain cancer and it has not grown at all.
Men and women! They do these checks on rats or mice or monkeys or whatever else they can get to sit nevertheless prolonged adequate to do these checks. If you have been provided a Substantial dose at the same fee equal to your weight size then you May get mind tumors. Might.
But with all the good that the MRI?s have carried out for me (even although I?m claustrophobic), I think I will nevertheless just take my possibilities.
Posted by Mr. Sunshine
Irresponsible journalism. If you had 4 mind MRI?s every single year for twenty five decades your chance element would only improve by five%.
Posted by Andrew Taylor
1) ?electromagnetic radiation is now assumed to lead to cancer?
IONIZING electromagnetic radiation (X-rays, gamma rays and many others) has been recognized for actually to trigger cancer. It can be ionizing ? it breaks chemical bonds.
2) NON-IONIZING radiation ? eg radio waves, cell telephone indicators, MRIs ? do not break bonds. There is no theoretical explanation why they really should trigger cancer at the doses that people typically encounter. At extremely higher doses they can overheat tissues and can cause hurt that way.
There have been a long time of study (a lot of it not good) on the effects of non-thermal levels of non-ionizing radiation: mobile reports, animal scientific studies, epidemiological studies. Much of it driven by peoples? fears about exposure to cell phone indicators.
Just take home (IMHO) is that there is no credible proof for any harm induced by the ranges that folks are uncovered to.
Some fifteen many years back I searched the literature for evidence of damage from MRI exposure ? it was component of my duty as a member of our security committee. I could find no proof of any diseases triggered by MRI exposure.
phillies cie college humor braveheart fernando torres fernando torres cdt
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.